Marielle Staropoli
When it comes to my GAME plan, I have been very fortunate in terms of finding resources. This has to do with the fact that when I created my plan, I made an effort to choose goals that were new, but attainable, and to use resources that I might need to specifically seek out, but that I would ultimately be able to find. At this point, there are no major changes that I need to make to my action plan. There are, however, small steps or pieces of more specific information that I had not originally anticipated being a part of my plan.
For example, initially I stated that I would need to review my unit plans and try to determine where technology would benefit instruction. Since, I have determined that I will use Edmodo to administer group discussions. To plan for this, I met with one of the teachers on my grade level team. She uses Edmodo regularly, so I am fortunate in that my students are already well-versed in the technicalities like logging in and using their group code, as well as some of the online etiquette components that I briefly addressed in my last post. To remain uniform with what students already know, I will obtain my teammate’s rubrics and instructions, altering them slightly to fit my needs, but staying as close to her version as possible.
The other commitment I made is to begin supplementing my instruction with tutorials and videos that I am able to find online. In terms of gathering videos for use in the flipped classroom model, I have begun collecting links in a single document. I write a brief description of each link for my own records. My next step that I had not originally considered is how my students will gain access to these links. I will be able to post links directly on Edmodo, which will allow my students to participate both in their discussions and their out of class learning on a single site. For now, I will not require my students to access these videos in lieu of a traditional classroom lesson. Instead, these videos will serve as supplements to what students already worked on or have learned about in class. Eventually, I would like students to access these videos in place of a lesson, saving classroom time for practice implementing the lesson’s content.
Worth mentioning, as well, is my commitment to using the tools that are available on the computer to aid student understanding. While this might seem obvious, it actually does require me to make a concerted effort to direct students towards these tools. Quite often, students will ask me questions such as “How do you spell…?” or “What size font am I supposed to use for MLA?” and ordinarily, I would just give them an answer. Now, my response has become, “You are on a computer, you can very easily find that out for yourself, do you know how?” The majority of students do, but are not accustomed to having the freedom to open another tab and visit a dictionary website or to google something they need answered.
Utilizing the tools available works well for the general population of learners, but it is also beneficial to my exceptional learners. Rather than waiting until the moment in need to direct a student to a useful tool, I have committed to planning ahead of time where in my lessons these tools fit in and which students (for the most part) will benefit from their implementation. I will do this by revisiting the data I have collected about my students (I have formative assessment data that I collect regularly as well as data from several baseline assessments I administered at the start of the school year). Though I have already familiarized myself with the required elements of my students’ IEPs, I will need to revisit the IEPs in order to determine whether there are any resources available to me or adaptations that I could make to the computers that would be conducive to student learning (Cennamo, Ross, & Ertmer, 2009). By planning how and when I will use assistive technology, I am implementing Universal Design for Learning (Cennamo, Ross, & Ertmer, 2009).
As I continue working towards my GAME plan, I have learned the importance of trying to think through the long term plausibility of a goal and the fact that unexpected changes are almost guaranteed to happen. Though I feel confident that I will be able to achieve my technology-related goals, it is reassuring to know that the goals I have selected can be supported by my colleagues at school and peers at Walden. I have already learned a great deal from the conversations I share with my Walden classmates, and it has been useful to collaborate with my team member on something instruction related (unfortunately, the bulk of our conversations do not focus on student learning or effective strategies, but instead on student behavior/concerns). As we continue to have these conversations, and my comfort level with certain technologies and practices increases, I look forward to setting new goals for growth.
Reference
Cennamo, K., Ross, J., & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc. custom ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
5 comments:
Marielle,
I think your GAME plan sounds like it is well on its successful way. You have really put a lot of thought into every aspect of helping your students achieve the goals and objectives necessary to learn. Your approach to assistive technology definitely addresses ISTE 4.b- to “address the diverse needs of all learners by using learner-centered strategies” (2008). It is so important to weave the technology through the lesson, and not just weave a lesson around technology for the sake of using the technology. You have done that by using the tools available to your students as they write.
Like you I encourage my students to find answers on their own, and do not expect them to ask a question at every turn or bump they encounter. As teachers become more comfortable handing the control over to the students, our students will be more comfortable taking charge and directing their learning. Power through the problem is what I tell them. I have also told them to engage their mental 4x4 and work it out. This is a silly analogy, but it shows them that there are struggles everywhere and they have the get through them one way or another.
Good luck implementing all parts of your plan,
Lara
References
International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National education standards for teachers (NETS-T). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers
Marielle,
I am impressed by how well you have thought through your plan and are still finding more that you can do. I personally like Edmodo for its versatility. Posting links for students makes it easy to quickly find the links you want them to use. We all know that students typing in URLs can be painful and slow. A link on Edmodo is also great support for IEP students who might have difficulty finding an appropriate website. On Edmodo, students have access to your information anytime and on any device. In addition, Edmodo is a great tool for collecting student responses all in one place.
What a great idea to encourage your students to find solutions to challenges on their own. I am definitely going to encourage students to use the computer to find answers on their own and not rely so much on me.
Lastly, your desire to address the needs of your special education students by using assistive technology when possible will help eliminate learning barriers that may exist without technology.
Good luck with your plan.
Marjorie
Marielle,
I believe Lara hit the nail on the head with her comment about not weaving a lesson around the technology but leaving the technology around the lesson! Tim Best has said that the point of using technology in lessons is to make sure that it improves the transition of information, not constricts it, "Technology tools must bet the content (Laureate Education, 2009)!" In short, I believe it sounds like you are strongly on the right track when it comes to your tech integration in your lessons!
Nate P.
Reference:
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2009). Integrating technology across the content areas: Promoting creative thinking with technology. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Lara,
When it comes to answering student questions, I have to remind myself that it is a good thing that they are asking in the first place. However, I think it might open the door for a discussion about the different kinds of questions and how not all questions encourage the same type of higher order thinking. If I spend some time with my learners distinguishing between thoughtful, thought-provoking questions versus those that are “right there” and could be found easily, they might not be as sensitive to me sending them off on their own to find answers (Alvermann, Phelps, & Ridgeway, 2007). There are so many benefits to students owning their learning process by forming questions in their minds; however, I need to work with them more on the types of questions they form!
Marielle
Reference
Alvermann, D. E., Phelps, S. F., & Ridgeway, V. G. (2007). Content area reading and literacy: Succeeding in today's diverse classrooms (Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Marielle,
It sounds as though your GAME plan is off to a good start. It is important to choose challenging, yet obtainable goals. (This is also good modeling for your students. You should inform them of how you went about choosing your goals. You can "show" them your process through a think-aloud activity.)
I have heard a lot regarding Edmodo during my time at Walden, but in this course especially. I am not personally familiar with it; however, it appears to be a valuable, functioning resource. I started researching it (Internet) a bit, but realize I have a lot to learn. It is good that you have a team member that is already using it. She will be a valuable resource as you integrate it into your classroom. And what a blessing to your students that you plan on using rubrics and instructions they are already familiar with. Kudos to you for thinking of them! Daniel Engstrom wrote, "designing quality assessment begins before an instructional unit is started, not afterwards" (Engstrom, 2005, p. 31). It sounds as though you are already on the right track by planning ahead for your students’ needs in this area.
I like your idea of using videos to help supplement your teaching. I had not thought of doing this. You have sparked in interest. I will write this idea down in my journal.
I have to say that I was surprised by your comment regarding students not being accustomed to opening other tabs while working on the computer. Is this a school restriction, or is it something other teachers instill in them?
Again, it sounds like you are off to a good start with your GAME plan. Hopefully, you won’t have to do too much tweaking as we move forward.
Good luck.
Kimberly
Reference
Engstrom, D. E. (2005). Assessing for technological literacy. Technology Teacher, 64(4), 30–32. Retrieved from the Academic Search Complete database.
Post a Comment